Answers. Results. Justice.

$17 million Jury Verdict - Surgical/hospital negligence

$3.650 million Jury Verdict - Surgical/hospital negligence

$3.650 million Jury Verdict -Surgical/hospital negligence

$6.275 million Settlement - Sexual Assaults by Hospital Employee

$2.5 million Jury Verdict - Surgical/hospital negligence

$1.2 million Settlement - Surgical error; medication error

$1.9 million Settlement - Birth Trauma

Ten Horrified Women Sue St. Louis-Area Plastic Surgeon After She Put Pictures of Their Breasts Online

Ten women are in the process of suing a St. Louis-area plastic surgeon for  posting pictures of their breasts on the internet.

Before-and-after pictures are a common way for plastic surgeons to show  prospective clients the quality of their work. In Dr. Michelle Koo’s case,  the photos shown on the website were without names attached, before and after  their breast augmentations. When pictures are uploaded using files with  patients’ names however, the pictures come up on search engines.

For some of these women, who were 21 to 58 years old at the time of the  surgeries, the searches popped up when they searched for their own names. For  other women, the discovery came to their attention when friends searched for  their names.

The suits are all pending in federal courts.

Dr. Koo’s site is managed by Long Island, NY-based MedNet Technologies, Inc.  They also manage 2,500 other medical health care providers. MedNet says that Dr.  Koo is responsible, as they are not culpable for what third-party providers post  onto their site.

Dr. Koo says that the blame lies with MedNet.

Indeed, Neil Bruntrager, the lawyer for eight of the ten clients, says that  he has been contacted by lawyers from four other states who were troubled about  the practices of some of MedNet’s competitors. He says that this is a much  larger problem.

According to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, a simple internet  search for various doctors’ websites pulled up pictures and names of clients  who’d had nose jobs, liposuctions, face lifts, and breast augmentations and  reductions. This search only took place earlier this month.

Einstein Medical, a MedNet competitor, said that, in 16 or 17 years, only one  instance like Dr. Koo’s has emerged. They deleted the photo immediately, before  even informing the physician involved. But they also said that medical clients  were warned against using names, and was shocked that problems like these even  occur. In an age with strengthened algorithms for search engines, where almost  anything is searchable, they said that removing the names would be common  sense.

For most, if not all, patients whose pictures were searchable with their  names, they had all signed agreements stating that physicians could use their  pictures for their websites. (Some could not remember, or denied signing such a  waiver) but all the people that the St. Louis Post-Dispatch contacted  said that it was not okay that searching for their names could turn up those  images.

Medical professionals’ websites that are found to violate confidentiality  agreements are supposed to contact the patients involved within 60 days.  However, in none of the cases that the Post-Dispatch contacted, did  that seem to be the case.

Dr. Koo’s website has since removed the photos in question.

Source: Medical Daily at

FindLaw Network